Black Legislatures Who Pushed Hb 4050 Say Critics Are Wrong
Chicago Defender › August 12, 2009
Linked as:
Chicago Defender › August 12, 2009
Linked as:Summary
"I took out all of the zip codes because I wanted it to be statewide, but we couldn't pass it statewide," [Jacqueline Collins] said. "Those same individuals who are protesting it being zip codes protested it being countywide or statewide."
"In order to point out the problem with foreclosures, we have to do a study," [Deborah L. Graham] said. "This (HB 4050) is the study. This is a pilot program. In order to find out if there is a problem we have to do a sampling with the 10 zip codes. But the Department of Financial and Professional Regulation chose those zip codes.""It's a pilot program designed to find out if there is a better way to educate consumers who live in communities who are most likely to be offered predatory loans," [Susan Hofer] said. "We chose the 10 zip codes based on criteria in the law. And the criteria are what I told you about first. The original language in the law, when they were debating this, was five zip codes. Those five zip codes are part of the 10."See the full content of this document
Extract
Black Legislatures Who Pushed Hb 4050 Say Critics Are Wrong
While a coalition of Black and Latino South Side residents met Wednesday to figure out a way to rescind predatory lending law House Bill 4050, a couple of Illinois Black Caucus legislators defended their actions in helping push through the bill.
State Sen. Jacqueline Collins (D-16th) and State Rep. Deborah L. Graham (D-78th) told the D...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
45 CFR 1301.12 Annual audit of Head Start programs. | 7 cfr 984.87 - duration of immunities. | 7 CFR 29.1134 - Rule 28. | 27 CFR 9.120 - Sierra Foothills. | Sentencia nº 2515 de Consiglio di Stato, May 13, 2008 | Sentencia nº 2042 de Consiglio di Stato April 16 2008 | Sentencia nº 6024 de Consiglio di Stato December 03 2009 | Sentencia nº 6139 de Consiglio di Stato, December 14, 2009