50 Years Later, Brown V. Board of Education Is Still a Compelling Decision
Chicago Defender › July 30, 2009
Linked as:
Chicago Defender › July 30, 2009
Linked as:Summary
The lead attorney on the case, Thurgood Marshall, and his colleagues wrote that states had no valid reason to impose segregation, that racial separation -- no matter how equal the facilities -- caused psychological damage to Black children, and that "restrictions or distinctions based upon race or color" violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
It echoed Marshall's expert witnesses, stating that for African American schoolchildren, segregation "generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely to ever be undone."See the full content of this document
Extract
50 Years Later, Brown V. Board of Education Is Still a Compelling Decision
On May 17, 1954, in the case of Brown v. the Board of Education of Topeka, KS, the U.S. Supreme Court en...
See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Barnes, Lawrence (Larry) D. | Part II | Calling All Tourists | No. Haven Finance Board to Start Again with 'Clean Slate' Budget | Sentencia nº 34 de Consiglio di Stato, January 09, 2010 | Sentencia nº 2762 de Consiglio di Stato June 05 2009 | Sentencia nº 5427 de Consiglio di Stato, October 15, 2008 | sentencia nº 556 de consiglio di stato january 27 2009