50 Years Later, Brown V. Board of Education Is Still a Compelling Decision
Chicago Defender › July 30, 2009
Linked as:
Chicago Defender › July 30, 2009
Linked as:Summary
The lead attorney on the case, Thurgood Marshall, and his colleagues wrote that states had no valid reason to impose segregation, that racial separation -- no matter how equal the facilities -- caused psychological damage to Black children, and that "restrictions or distinctions based upon race or color" violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
It echoed Marshall's expert witnesses, stating that for African American schoolchildren, segregation "generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely to ever be undone."See the full content of this document
Extract
50 Years Later, Brown V. Board of Education Is Still a Compelling Decision
On May 17, 1954, in the case of Brown v. the Board of Education of Topeka, KS, the U.S. Supreme Court en...
See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Company Watch - Copa Airlines. | Elite Imaging Introduces Strongest MRI Machine to South Florida for Outpatient Imaging. | Celebrating the IADC's 85th anniversary. | Bottling building. | Decisión nº 1970 de Juzgado Segundo de Primera Instancia en lo Civil, Mercantil, ... | Decisión de Juzgado Quinto Primera Instancia en lo Civil Mercantil y del Transito de Caracas de April 16 2009 | Decisión nº S-N de Tribunal Cuarto de Primera Instancia en Funciones de Control de Falcon Extensión Coro de October 14 2008 | decisión de corte de apelaciones sala 2 de lara, de october 10, 2008